TOVO vs Kevin's own approach
A structured, licensed curriculum against a deliberately unstructured one. TOVO tells you what to run and when; Kevin's own approach asks you to judge what fits your players and your week, including whether any single system should.
There is no universal winner here. This is a working, rules-based comparison rather than a validated assessment, and it stays outside search indexes while this remains a pilot ahead of its formal launch decision.
Structure
A mix
Structure
Mostly exploratory
Time demand
Moderate
Time demand
Low
Coach education
Moderate
Coach education
Low
Space and equipment
Moderate
Space and equipment
Low
Best age fit
9 to 11s, 12 to 15s
Best age fit
5 to 8s, 9 to 11s, 12 to 15s, 16 and up
TOVO
A coach-education and curriculum brand founded by Todd Beane, built on positional-play principles.
A structured, positional-play curriculum with its own coach-licensing pathway and session library.
Kevin's take: A commercial competitor in the same space as 360TFT's own coach education. Judge it on the same axes as everything else here, not on the brand.
Primary sourceKevin's own approach
Kevin Middleton's own coaching practice since 2010, set out in his book The Rise of the Dogmatic Football Coach and the Agentic Pathway.
Starts from the position that no single methodology fits every context, and asks a coach to judge which tools and ideas fit their players, time and environment rather than following one system by default.
Kevin's take: This is deliberately the least prescriptive profile here. It will not tell you what to run on Tuesday night. It will help you judge whether any of the other seven, or none of them, is worth trying.
Kevin Middleton owns FootballGPT and Football Frameworks. This profile is scored on the same axes as every methodology above, not given a different standard.
Primary source